AGI Milestone Tracker

Community

Public input

Please let us know what you have in mind. We will review all suggestions and consider them for future updates.

Current queue

Sample community suggestions

Separate factual accuracy from factual honesty more explicitly

The new evidence dimension covers both, but a future revision could make bluffing-versus-being-wrong a more visible distinction in the public wording.

reviewing

A. Chen | Mar 18, 2026

Add a stronger threshold for long-horizon drift resistance

Repeated-use stability may deserve its own more prominent card or a more demanding question set under the reliability dimension.

queued

J. Morales | Mar 20, 2026

Expose the hidden capability coverage map more clearly

A lightweight legend showing which deeper dimensions each card covers could help expert users audit completeness without confusing general audiences.

merged

R. Singh | Mar 14, 2026

Strengthen the scientific-backing note on each granular item

Showing the best evidence forms directly in the detail view would make it easier to see what kind of science could actually satisfy each question.

queued

L. Becker | Mar 21, 2026

Public input

Suggestion form